PS: the recent series of Bowen reproduced wangdehua teachers, mainly for their own The next step in the br> (insert the first sentence, you must have read: I said when I wrote the blog, those of education articles, my heart has a readership that my students, whether you're in school or graduated, whether you domestic or foreign, whether you have a mentor or a professor, I is the tone, the tone of the teacher, the lesson the students used to it, presumably they also became accustomed to. In addition there is a reader in my heart, that is my son. His life is in learning set the age of knowledge, whether face to face lecture has happened, perhaps he will write down the time to read, useful to him hope he can have time to browse Web of Science play the game look better than large Well . So, some friends to see I blog articles, and sometimes the tone does not always feel like a lecture, said too shallow, are some common sense here, What is it nagging. I have I little thinking, so you know to understand After it, subject to later see the contents of that I say, did not have to click to the disappointment, a waste of your valuable time. Of course, what about the students, I encourage my students to read the. I Again, thank you bear with!)
tttttttttttttttttttttttttt
my article: to encourage independent thinking right is necessary, the back to talk about this idea. we did say ; could be understood as a reference as to write the article? We just such an explanation is given for reference discussion, meaning In this proposed, we shall be a my students. if we will be in the open group. In my blog, dare to be so answer this question:
we study groups have been advocating and encouraging independent thinking, even though the results of innovation are not many, but we also see that our progress in these years, we can see that subjects in the study group in the country's status (international position we do not have any say). However, we should also remember that when you step into the time we set, we first and foremost requirement is to get to know the work of the Study Group has been accumulated and the brothers and sisters in school they communicate, then the direction of research and development group planning to spend a semester is almost time to read, understand and master documents, control of both the study group in the conventional experimental methods, through weekly study group meetings and our group The other modes of communication, to improve and enhance everyone's knowledge structure, training, research skills and research all specifications. (PS: I would like to continue and teachers to discuss our research group in terms of vulnerability in the typhoon what advantages)
Therefore, I advocate a new, to encourage new, to encourage new methods to encourage new indicator parameters, to encourage new comprehensive, encouraging new exploration. I have often asked: You have used a new method if the literature (if original), new indicators reported in the literature whether the hh for our methods and indicators in the field, our team have the ability to grasp, but for some of the new interdisciplinary methods and indicators, our group does not have enough capacity to grasp. Therefore, to introduce and borrow methods and indicators of other disciplines, we need to demonstrate through rigorous study group to explore and experiment. This is all very familiar and often do.
read literature, listen to reports, writing papers reference, we ask for is the first To understand how people say, then how do you understand. We taboo others, and we have no results and conclusions, have their own assessment, whether appreciated or have different views. their views and discussed, we do not know if they are , we have to learn new knowledge, as, if we have the foundation and background (the field), then we must use our own background knowledge to understand, rather than parrot, not when the messenger. read documents and listen to report, to accept their point of view, especially some of you think that the new point of view, really need to go through your brain, chewing through their own recollection, and sometimes people really feel the description is so wonderful; If you do not agree with them more need to mobilize reserve your knowledge, learn and master the use of your expertise to the discussion. (PS: The key point, how deep your professional reserves? ask myself, in terms of vulnerability typhoon reserve the number of my professional ? Since this is a new area, so reserve base is zero, the relevant background it? probabilistic reliability? statistics? random process? stochastic finite element? random vibration? (In addition, the knowledge is superficial and did not depth over) learned that his previous knowledge of the other seems of no use it? such as structural dynamics, ah, ah plastic mechanics, as well as the structure of undergraduate courses, it seems that the research on the vulnerability does not help? is it really? vulnerability in the end what knowledge? you clear it? In addition, not say to learn how to learn it? That is, the process of doing the subject, and do what need to use? then Study as the results so far? In addition, the teacher's professional reserves? teachers on this aspect of familiarity with the literature? He inspired in this regard, guidance, criticism or accept any of my views do ?...)
Whether we accept or against, we need to filter through the minds of their own. If you want to accept and adopt a method, we need to know the limitations of this method and operating conditions. If we accept a new idea or concept, we need to know the ins and outs of this concept, and made the background. do not understand is blindly accepted; not understand worship is obedience. there is no accepted thinking is that blind obedience. If you think or believe that the authority said is correct, it is absolutely blind obedience. science has limits, not to mention as one of the scholars. (PS: I now have to figure out all the existing details of the vulnerability of the literature, those are classic literature? Yes No junk literature it? how to identify it ? or professional reserve!)
do not feel inferior, not arrogant. arrogant, very funny; sell ourselves short, very sad. narcissism, desirable; self-enclosed, but can not. open eyes, open mind, rational thinking, scientific attitude. quick to deny Darwin, Newton challenged at every turn, and always wanted to overthrow Einstein, it is not independent thinking. At any time, should have a self, if they lose their identity, and you will get lost, sooner or later fall ditch to go.
some students do not show a lot of confidence, bottom of my heart to think that foreigners are new, are trend-. we are stressed, some well-known laboratories, leading the development of international disciplines laboratory, we are leading the development of the subject, their views and progress of particular concern and attention, and why? This is not right enough. international authority than their own letters, is peer recognition. (PS: Typhoon vulnerability context, what exactly is the famous lab? you find out? Why the delay in the conclusion it? is why we always feel that they are not necessarily looking for classic literature? is not necessarily the mainstream?) some level with us the article about the lab, then you value their article, why do our own research group published an article by leaving the country to ignore it? Think about it, we own articles published in foreign language, we all read off a few times ah? of their results are not valued, to believe that we are not much stronger than the results of the laboratory, is not it a bit too look down on yourself? he said, yes, where? said that he has less than, less than where ? Why use this method, why use this index, why should this concept, why should hh you've got to ask you? (PS: Yes ah, I have asked it? or that problem, how to determine the right or inadequate? professional reserve!!)
some students always ask this target right? which indicator you? this method will you, so you can design it? this understanding can you? h. similar to these problems, are our daily problems, but you must be clear, I said are all not ah, I said the line on the line ah? can ah can I say? I have so much skill that, ah, this is our group discussion to demonstrate the collective reasons. Of course, in dispute over the circumstances, in order not to affect the study progress, I will exercise my right, but not guaranteed to be right, maybe after a week or how much time, we all understand, and reached a consensus, we to change again. We must insist on the right, less of us to amend the error of the firm to reverse. (PS: Yes! must not repeat what others say, because the authorities are likely wrong, the teacher said, of course not all right! must be convinced of this point, We are not the person, who said it does not matter, but want to say so, to identify)
This is what I said the right to think independently. his mind is almost blank, put forward the idea of points is not impossible to whimsical , but certainly can not just be implemented as a formal experiment. In the study group did not convince me and other members, I can not take the risk to you, as dissertation topics. We encourage the free exploration, but we do not encourage scientific proof has not been exploration. We encourage the scientific adventure, but we do not encourage devotion to know are throwing money at those risks. (PS: I am basically, first convince themselves to go to convince the teacher! or regular meeting, then have the opportunity to persuade the other members of the Study Group )
I advocate the encouragement of independent thinking, is also based on one of the biggest concerns is: out of our group of students to outsiders, is a mold production, way of thinking is a thinking, doing a routine. I hope that : a well-recognized group in the fine traditions and culture, a good way, good atmosphere, we have to take out, passed along, to carry forward. Study Group Study Group for a culture of development and growth is incredibly important, but can not be limit all development and innovation of a restraint. Why are units where some teachers said, watching the students life skills approach and talk attitude to know that the study group. attend an academic conference, when not also the teacher asked: who do report is not your group students ah? I asked how do you know? they say they do report to see the style of your team to know that. see how deep the poison!
say it again: This is the group I will open it, the tone is I students.
(Dehua 2009.12.26)
No comments:
Post a Comment